Sign in
Back
Franconia United Methodist Church

Inspection · 2022-09-29

Date
2022-09-29
Complaint Related
No
Licensing Inspector
Karen Dickens
(571) 423-6978
SHSIA monitoring inspection of an approved subsidy vendor to determine compliance with current subsidy requirements regarding the health and safety of children and to promote quality standards for the children in their care.
No

Areas Reviewed

?22.1 Religious Exempt; Background Checks Code; Carbon Monoxide
?32.1 Report by person other than physician
?54.1 Must be MAT Certified.
?63.2 Child abuse and neglect
? 8VAC20-770 Background Checks
?8VAC20-790 Subsidy Program Vendor Requirements for Child Day Centers

Inspector Notes

An annual RECDC monitoring inspection was conducted on today?s date between 10:00 am-11:15 am. The church operates a preschool with four classrooms. The center had a total of 32 children with seven supervising staff. All groupings were in ratio. The center has rooms with adequate space and supplies for the children to explore. The children were engaged in snack time, group activities, and playground time. There were positive interactions observed between the children and the staff members. Please contact me at Karen.dickens@doe.virginia.gov for any questions.

Violations

2
Standard 22.1-289.058
Based on observation and interview, the center that serves preschool age children was not equipped with at least one carbon monoxide detector.
Evidence:
1. The center was not equipped with at least one carbon monoxide detector.
2. Staff #1 confirmed that the center was not equipped with at least one carbon monoxide detector.
Plan of Correction: A carbon monoxide detector was purchased today and placed in the hallway of the program.
Standard 8VAC20-770-40-D-2
Based on record review and interview, Central Registry Results were not obtained within 30 days of employment.
Evidence:
1. Staff #8's record (Date of hire-09/01/2021) did not contain documentation of Central Registry Results. The record contained the documentation of a Central Registry Search that was mailed and received by the state agency; however, the results were not in the record.
2. Staff #1 stated that a Central Registry was submitted and returned for Staff #8 while they were a volunteer for the program. Staff #1 stated that the results may have been shredded once Staff # 8 became an employee.
Plan of Correction: The center emailed the Office of Background Investigations to obtain a copy of the staff member's Central Registry Results. Once the results are obtained, the center will email the licensing inspector the document.