Inspection · 2024-06-13
(757) 334-4329
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-820 HEARINGS PROCEDURES.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
A monitoring inspection was initiated and concluded on June 13, 2024. The inspector arrived at 12:10 PM and departed at 1:30 PM. There were 28 children present, ranging in ages from infant to four years, with 5 staff supervising. The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, medication, special care and emergencies and nutrition. The children were on cots during the inspection. A total of 4 child records and 3 staff records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program and discussed with staff 1 and staff 5 during the exit interview.
Violations
10Evidence:
The record provided for staff 4 indicated that staff 4 had resided in both Alaska and New Mexico within the past five years. Results of criminal history checks were not obtain from either staff.
Evidence:
1. There was a container of sanitizing wipes with a warning label on a counter in the toddler classroom where children were napping.
2. There were 4 containers of pouch paint on a desk in the preschool classroom where children were napping. There was also personal spray, aerosol air freshener and mouth rinse in an unlocked cabinet. All containers had warning labels.
3. There was spray all purpose cleaner and containers of sanitizing wipes, al with warning labels in a box on a floor in the four year old classroom where children were napping. In addition, there was aerosol air freshener with a warning label on the desk.
4. Staff 1 verified all of the above.
Evidence:
1. A large molded plastic climbing structure with platforms and a slide was placed on the playground. The structure was only one foot from the back chain link fence and four feet from the wall. The structure was placed on 1 inch rubber mats and artificial turf was surrounding the mats.
2. There was a small "portable" slide approximately 2 feet high placed over less that one inch of shredded rubber mulch. The slide was surrounded by fencing and other toys with two feet of the slide.
Evidence:
When asked how many children were under her care in the four year old classroom, staff 4 had to count to see how many children were in her care.
Evidence:
1. There was a child in the preschool classroom who was sleeping with his head totally covered by a blanket.
2. There was a child in the four year old classroom who was sleeping with his head totally covered by a blanket.
Evidence:
There was no documentation showing that any shelter-in-place drills had been conducted within the past year.
Evidence:
There was no documentation showing that a lock-down drill has been conducted within the past year.
Evidence:
1. There was a prepared infant bottle on a shelf with a child's name but no date.
2. There were two prepared infant bottles in the refrigerator that were not labeled with children's names or dates.
3. Staff 1 verified that the bottles were missing names and dates,
Evidence:
1. The record provided for child 1 did not include information regarding the father's employer. In addition, the parent did not provide the street addresses for the two persons to be contacted in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached. The same record did not include documentation that the child's proof of identity had been verified.
2. The record provided for child 4 did not include the business telephone number for the mother.
Evidence:
1. The record provided for staff 2 indicated that staff 2 is an assistant staff. Staff 1 and staff 5 stated that staff 2 is a program leader. There was no documentation to show program leader qualifications of staff 2.
2. The record provided for staff 3 indicated that staff 3 is a program leader. There was no documentation to demonstrate the qualifications of staff 3 as a program leader. In addition, only one reference check was obtained prior to the hire of staff 3.
3. The record provided for staff 4 had documentation of only one reference check being made prior to hire.