Inspection · 2022-03-28
(804) 629-7103
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-800 Administration
8VAC20-800 Physical Health of Caregivers and Household Members
8VAC20-800 Physical Equipment and Environment
8VAC20-800 Care of Children
8VAC20-800 Preventing the Spread of Disease
8VAC20-800 Emergencies
8VAC20-800 Nutrition
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
Inspector Notes
An unannounced monitoring inspection was conducted on 03/28/2022 between the hours of approximately 9:15 am to 10:45 am. There were 10 children present, ranging in ages from 7 months to 4 years old, with an assistant supervising. The provider was not present in the family day home at the time of inspection.
The entire physical space of the family day home was reviewed. The inspector also reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, special care and emergencies and nutrition. There were no medications on site today. A total of 10 child records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program. If you have any questions regarding this inspection, please contact the Licensing Inspector, Maria Robles at maria.robles@doe.virginia.gov.
Violations
15Evidence:
1) The record for Child #2 did not contain the results of a physical examination. The record contained a CoVA School Entrance Health form but it was blank.
Evidence:
a] On the date of inspection, drawers under the sink in the bathroom of the care area contained 4 containers of hair products (curl activator, leave in conditioner). The cabinet doors and drawers did not have locks or child-proof locking mechanisms on them. The door to the bathroom was unlocked. b] On a shelf of the bookcase near the kitchen entrance, there was a container of face cream (retinol advanced cream). c] In the kitchen cabinet under the sink, a bottle of dishwashing soap, and a bottle of counter cleaner were observed. The cabinet door did not have a lock or child-proof locking mechanism on it. The door to the kitchen was wide open.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, the following outlets were observed not having child-resistant protective covers installed: next to the coat rack near the entrance, to the left of the big tv, and in the infant room there were 3 outlets uncovered (near the zebra, next to one of the cribs, inside one of the cubbies near the rug).
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, a written record of attendance for the day was not available for review. 2) Staff #1 could not locate the attendance record for the day upon request. Attendance records for the following dates were provided: 02/28 to 03/04, 03/07 to 03/11 and 03/13 to 03/17.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, Staff #1 was observed in the infant's room attending to children on the rug area. Child #5 (dob 08/11/2021) was observed inside the crib. The access side of the crib was down.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, Staff #1 was caring for a total of 19 points (10 children). Staff #1 stated that the provider was out of the fdh that day.
Evidence:
1) The record for Child #1 did not contain the telephone number of each custodial parent's place of employment; the record for Child #2 did not contain the policy number of the child's medical insurance; the record for Child #3 did not contain the address of each custodial parent's place of employment, telephone number of one custodial parent's place of employment, and the policy number of the child's medical insurance; the record for Child #4 did not contain telephone number of one custodial parent's place of employment and the policy number of the child's medical insurance; thee record for Child #6 did not contain address of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, it was observed that the changing mat in the diapering area was covered by a cloth cover, making it not-nonabsorbent and not washable.
Evidence:
a] The record for Child #1 (start 08/24/2020) contained a signed copy of the "Information for parents" form, however it was blank, no information of the fdh was provided in it. b] The information in the record for Child #2 (start 06/08/2020) was incomplete since only the first page of the "Information for parents" form was found in the record. The second page which includes more information on the fdh and the signed acknowledgment from the parent was missing. c] The record for Child #2 contained a signed copy of the "Provisions of the Emergency Plan" form, however it was blank, no information of the fdh was provided in it.d] The records for Child #5 (start 11/08/2021) contained a copy of the "Liability Insurance Declaration" form, however, it was ot signed by the parents.
Evidence:
1) The most recent review of the emergency information in the record for Child #1 was dated 08/20/2020, for Child #2 was dated 06/05/2020, for Child #4 was dated 03/10/2019, for Child #7 was dated 07/28/2019, for Child #8 was dated10/12/18, for Child #9 was dated 04/08/2019, for Child #10 was dated 06/04/2019.
Evidence:
1) The EPP submitted for review did not list an additional person to act as a back up care. The person listed is the provider.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, the emergency drills log was not available for review. Upon request, the emergency drills log was submitted electronically. Shelter-in-place drills were not documented for the year 2021.
Evidence:
1) The most recent immunization report in the record for Child #4 (dob 12/17/2018) was dated 02/19/2019.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, the menu for the current one-week period was not dated.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, the most recently issued license was not posted. The posted license was dated September 2020/September 2021. 2) Staff #1 could not locate the current license.