Virginia
Sign in
Back
Lucy Ayala

Inspection · 2022-09-09

Date
2022-09-09
Complaint Related
No
Licensing Inspector
Tameika King
(804) 629-7486
SHSIA monitoring inspection of an approved subsidy vendor to determine compliance with current subsidy requirements regarding the health and safety of children and to promote quality standards for the children in their care.
Yes

Areas Reviewed

8VAC20-790 Subsidy Program Vendor Requirements for Family Day Homes

Inspector Notes

A Subsidy Health and Safety inspection was conducted on 09/09/2022 between the hours of approximately 2:55 p.m. and 4:25 p.m. There were 8 children present with the Provider and 2 assistants for a total of 22 points within the supervision guidelines. The children were observed listening to a story and engaging in free play. Positive interactions were observed during this inspection. A complete inspection of the physical plant, children and staff records, menu, attendance and emergency procedures were observed during this inspection. There were 0 medications on site at this time. A licensing inspection was also conducted on this date; the two inspections combined cover all subsidy health and safety requirements. Only subsidy requirements that are not covered in licensing standards are reviewed during this supplemental inspection. Information gathered during the supplemental subsidy health and safety inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program. Thank you for your cooperation today. Please email with questions at: tameika.king@doe.virginia.gov

Violations

2
Standard 8VAC20-790-170-G
Based on observation and caregiver interview, the vendor did not maintain, in a way that is accessible to all caregivers, a current written list of all children?s allergies.

Evidence: Caregiver #1 stated that they did not have a written list of all children?s allergies.
Plan of Correction: I will make a list and post it today.
Standard 8VAC20-790-190-B-12
Based on record review, the vendor did not obtain all information for children?s records.

Evidence:
1. Child #1?s record indicates an allergy to cow?s milk, dairy and rice. The record for Child #1 did not include a written allergy care plan.
2. Child #2?s record indicates an allergy to peanuts. The record for Child #2 did not include a written allergy care plan.
Plan of Correction: I will ask the parents to bring one.
View original record on Virginia Department of Social Services