Inspection · 2022-05-24
(571) 835-0599
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-800 Administration
8VAC20-800 Personnel
8VAC20-800 Household Members
8VAC20-800 Physical Health of Caregivers and Household Members
8VAC20-800 Caregiver Training
8VAC20-800 Physical Equipment and Environment
8VAC20-800 Care of Children
8VAC20-800 Preventing the Spread of Disease
8VAC20-800 Medication Administration
8VAC20-800 Emergencies
8VAC20-800 Nutrition
Inspector Notes
A monitoring inspection was conducted on 05/24/2022 between the hours of approximately 8:15 am to 10:37 am. There were 10 children present, ranging in ages from 14 months to 3 years, with 3 caregivers supervising. Children were observed while free playing with toys and puzzles and eating snack. Caregivers were observed while actively supervising children, helping them washing hands, providing toys and distributing snack. Morning snack today consisted of apple slices and milk.
The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, special care and emergencies and nutrition. There were no medications on this date. A total of 3 child records and 2 staff records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program. If you have any questions regarding this inspection, please contact Maria Robles at maria.robles@doe.virginia.gov.
Violations
4Evidence:
1) The record for Child #3 did not contain the telephone number for the place of employment of a second custodial parent.
Evidence:
1) The records for Child #1, Child #2 and Child #3 did not contain signed acknowledgement of having received the family day home's policy for medication administration.
Evidence:
1) The authorization form for the use of non-prescription topical skin products for Child #1 showed an expiration date of 05/06/2022. Diaper cream for Child #1 is being used in the family day home. A new authorization form must be completed.
Evidence:
1) The menu available for review was not dated for the current one-week period. 2) The provider stated that she had not listed on the menu the menu substitutions for the day.