Sign in
Back
Genet Chinklo

Inspection · 2021-10-27

Date
2021-10-27
Complaint Related
No
Licensing Inspector
Mahrukh Aziz
(571) 835-4718
SHSIA monitoring inspection of an approved subsidy vendor to determine compliance with current subsidy requirements regarding the health and safety of children and to promote quality standards for the children in their care.
No

Areas Reviewed

22VAC40-111 Administration
22VAC40-111 Personnel
22VAC40-111 Physical Health of Caregivers and Household Members
22VAC40-111 Caregiver Training
22VAC40-111 Physical Environment and Equipment
22VAC40-111 Care of Children
22VAC40-111 Medication Administration
22VAC40-111 Emergencies
22VAC40-111 Nutrition
22VAC40-80 THE LICENSE.

Inspector Notes

This inspection was conducted by licensing staff using an alternate remote protocol, including telephone contacts, documents review, interviews, and a virtual tour of the setting.

A monitoring inspection was initiated on October 27, 2021 and conducted on November 4, 2021. The provider was contacted by telephone and a virtual inspection was conducted. There were 7 children present, ranging in ages from 7 months to 2 years, with 2 staff supervising for a total of 22 points. The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, special care and emergencies and nutrition. A total of 2 child records and 2 staff records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program. Please call 703-479-4679 or email cynthia.ford@doe.virginia.gov

Violations

2
Standard 22VAC40-111-60-B
Based on record review of 2 children's records it was determined that one did not contain a parent's work number.
Evidence:
1. Child 1's enrollment information contained work address for one parent but it didn't contain a work number.
Plan of Correction: I will ask parent to fill it out.
Standard 22VAC40-111-960-E
Based on observation and interview. it was determined that one infant's bottles were not fully labeled with the child's full name and formula was not labeled.
Evidence:
1, Infant B has bottles that had masking tape on that only showed part of the name. The formula container also did not include a label to indicate who it was for.
Plan of Correction: I have the others labeled and dated and will work on this.