Inspection · 2024-06-13
(757) 404-3063
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
An unannounced renewal inspection was initiated on 06/13/2024 at 10:08 am and completed on 06/13/2024 at 12:20 pm.
At the time of the tour 34 children were present with 5 teaching staff. The children in care ranged in age from 2 years - 4 years. Children were observed engaged in morning activities to include free play, music & movement, story time and lunch.
Records were reviewed for 6 children and 6 staff.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program.
Violations
6Evidence:
1. The most recent TB screening for staff 1 was completed on 11/03/2020.
2. Staff 1 confirmed that an updated TB screening had not been completed.
Evidence:
1. The most recent inspection from the Chesapeake Fire Marshall was conducted on 02/28/2023.
2. The PD confirmed that an updated inspection had not been requested.
Evidence:
1. The half Dutch-door at the entrance to the two-year old classroom was loose and did not maintain a secure closure of the two door halves, resulting in the top half swinging open several times during the inspection.
a. Unsecured Dutch type doors are a pinch point hazard for children's hands and fingers.
Evidence:
1. A container of hand sanitizer was observed placed on a book/toy storage unit in the two-year old and four-year old classrooms.
a. The label on the hand sanitizer indicated the contents were hazardous.
2. These containers were within easy reach of the children in care in both classrooms.
Evidence:
The licensee failed to ensure administrative oversight as demonstrated by the following:
1. The inspector observed 4 children with an unidentified staff person on the outdoor play area at 10:08 am when the inspector arrived.
a. The inspector did not see this staff person during the entrance tour, at approximately 10:10 am, and asked the five staff present the whereabout of this individual and the four children.
b. All staff present, staff 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, stated that they did not know who this individual was nor did they know where both the staff and 4 children were that had been observed on the outdoor play area.
c. After multiple inquiries as to who this individual was, staff 3 stated it may have been staff 4. Staff 3 additionally stated she was not sure however, and had no idea who the four children were that had been outside nor did she know where they were at present.
2. Staff 2, the designated person in charge of the facility, stated she was not aware of the names of the staff and four children the inspector had observed on the outdoor play area at approximately 10:08 am.
a. Staff 2 stated she did not know that any children or staff had been outside as she was not able to leave her classroom as she was needed to maintained the staff-to-child ratio of her group.
3. When the program director arrived at approximately 10:20 am it was learned that staff 4 had been outside with the children who were now in the two-year old classroom.
a. The program director stated that staff 4 had an an emergency and had departed the facility prior to the inspector entering the building.
a. The program director stated that the four children had been placed in the two-year old class prior to staff 4 leaving the facility.
Evidence:
The allergy list in the two-year old classroom was not kept confidential as it was posted on a bulletin board within clear view of anyone in the classroom.