Inspection · 2022-11-10
(540) 309-2494
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies.
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
Inspector Notes
An unannounced monitoring inspection was conducted on-site November 10, 2022. The director was available during the inspection. There were 48 children present, ranging in ages from 9 months to 4 years, with 9staff supervising. The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, medication, special care and emergencies and nutrition. A total of 5 child records and 4 staff records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program.
Please complete the ?plan of correction? and ?date to be corrected? for each violation cited on the violation notice and return it to me within 5 business days from today. Please specify how the deficient practice will be or has been corrected. Your plan of correction should contain: 1) steps to correct the noncompliance with the standard(s), 2) measures to prevent the noncompliance from occurring again; and 3) person(s) responsible for implementing each step and/or monitoring any preventative measures. Please do not use staff names; list staff by positions only.
Violations
10Evidence: 1. The record of staff #2, hired 11/8/22, did not contain documentation of fingerprints. Staff #2 was observed working with children. Staff #5 confirmed the fingerprint results were not complete and the center allowed staff #2 to start work regardless of not having the results.
2. The record of staff #4, hired 10/31/22, did not contain documentation of fingerprints. Staff #4 was observed working with children. Staff #5 confirmed the fingerprint results were not complete and the center allowed staff #4 to start work regardless of not having the results.
Evidence: The record of staff #3, hired 6/21/21, contained documentation of a central registry finding dated 8/5/21. Staff #5 stated there was no documentation of follow-up with OBI.
Evidence: 1. The record of staff #2, hired 11/8/22, did not contain documentation of a tuberculosis screening. Staff #2 was observed working with children on November 10, 2022. Staff #5 stated staff #2 had an appointment today and acknowledged it was not complete.
2. The record of staff #4, hired 10/31/22, contained documentation of a tuberculosis screening dated 11/7/22. Staff #5 confirmed that staff #2 began working with children on 10/31/22.
Evidence: The record of staff #3, hired 6/21/21, contained documentation of 8 hours of training from 6/21/21-6/20/22.
Evidence: 1. In the toddler classroom there was an unlocked cabinet under the sink containing PineSol. The label on the PineSol stated "keep out of reach of children" and "caution." Children were observed to open the unlocked cabinet.
2. In a bathroom used by children there was Febreeze in an unlocked cabinet. The label on the Febreeze stated "keep out of reach of children" and "caution."
3. In the pre-school room there was paint in an unlocked cabinet under the sink. The label on the paint stated "keep out of reach of children" and "warning."
4. Staff #5 acknowledged the substances were unlocked.
Evidence: 1. A review of the center's policy on unacceptable discipline states unacceptable discipline includes separation from the group.
2. On November 10, 2022, child #1 (age 2) was observed sitting alone behind a half wall, which separated this child from the other children, who were sitting on the other side of the wall listening to story time.
3. In an interview with staff #6 in the classroom it was stated that child #1 was in time-out.
4. Staff #5 acknowledged that the child was separated from the group and shouldn't have been.
Evidence: 1. On November 10, 2022, child #1 (age 2), was observed sitting in time-out for six minutes from 12:18pm-12:24pm. Child #1 was already in time-out when the inspector came into the classroom.
2. Staff #6 in the two-year old classroom confirmed child #1 was in time-out.
3. When asked what the center's time-out policy was, staff #5 stated one minute for each year of the child's age.
4. Staff #5 confirmed that six minutes was unacceptable for child #1 to be in time-out and that she would speak with the staff in the classroom.
Evidence: Staff #3, in the toddler room, was observed changing two children's diapers. Staff #3 did not wash her hands after each diaper change. Staff #3 confirmed she did not wash her hands.
Evidence: 1. In the toddler room, staff #3 was observed changing diapers. Staff #3 changed a child and immediately changed another child on the diapering surface without cleaning and sanitizing in between children.
Evidence: 1. The record of staff #3, hired 6/21/21, does not contain documentation of program leader qualifications. 2. Staff #3 was working in the capacity of program leader during the inspection. 3. Staff #5 confirmed the documentation of program leader qualifications was not present in the record.