Inspection · 2024-07-10

Based on observation the vendor did not ensure to have a written list of all children?s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary that is dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.
Evidence:
1. The written list of children's allergies was not dated.
2.The written list of children?s allergies was posted in a way that was not kept confidential.

Based on record review the vendor did not ensure that children?s records have all the required information.
Evidence:
1.The records for Child #1 and Child #2 did not contain the name, address, and phone number of one parent, or the name, address, and phone number of one parent's place of employment.
2. The record for Child #3 was missing the name, address, and phone number of one parent?s place of employment and an address for the required emergency contact.
3.The record for Child #4 was missing the name, address, and phone number of one parent?s place of employment, the name and address of the other parent?s place of employment, and all information for the required emergency contact.
4.The record for Child #5 did not contain a phone number of one parent?s place of employment or all information for the required emergency contact.

Based on record review the vendor did not ensure to obtain a minimum of sixteen clock hours of training annually, to include the department?s health and safety update course.
Evidence:
1.From September 2023- May 2024, which is the center?s training schedule, Staff #1 had two of 16 of the required annual training hours.
2. From September 2023- May 2024, which is the center?s training schedule, Staff #2 had zero of 16 of the required annual training hours.
3. There was no documentation that Staff #1 (hired in 2006) and Staff #2 (hired in 2017) completed the department?s health and safety update course in 2023.

Based on record review the vendor did not ensure that there shall be at least one staff on duty who has obtained within the last three years instruction in performing a daily health observation of children.
Evidence:
1.There was no documentation that Staff #1 or Staff #2 completed daily health observation training within the last three years.
a. Staff #1 and Staff #2 were observed working at the time of the inspection. There was no other staff on duty with a daily health observation training.

Based on observation and interview the vendor did not ensure that hazardous substances are kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
Evidence:
1.There were two tubes of heavy duty glue on a desk in the main classroom that children use. These substances were unlocked and accessible to children.
a. The manufacturer?s label for both tubes of heavy duty glue stated, ?Keep out of reach of children.?
2.Staff #1 confirmed that these tubes of heavy duty glue were left unlocked.

Based on observation and interview the vendor did not ensure that medication, including refrigerated medication and staff?s personal medication, is kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
Evidence:
1.There was an albuterol inhaler unlocked sitting on a desk in the main classroom that children use.
2.Staff #1 confirmed that the albuterol inhaler was not in a locked place that prevents access by children.

Based on record review the vendor did not ensure that evacuation drills were practiced the minimally required amount per year.
Evidence:
1. There was no documentation that evacuation drills were completed monthly from July 2023-December 2023, as required.
2.Staff #1 confirmed that they did not document when the evacuation drills identified in evidence #1 were completed.

Based on record review the vendor did not ensure that shelter in place procedures were practiced the minimally required amount per year.
1.There was no documentation that shelter in place procedures were practiced twice in 2023, as required.
2.Staff #1 confirmed that they did not document when the shelter in place procedures identified in evidence #1 were completed.