Inspection · 2022-02-17
(540) 847-9173
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 ADMINISTRATION.
8VAC20-780 STAFF QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING.
8VAC20-780 Physical plant.
8VAC20-780 STAFFING AND SUPERVISION.
8VAC20-780 PROGRAMS.
8VAC20-780 Special care provisions and emergencies.
8VAC20-780 SPECIAL SERVICES.
8VAC20-790 SUBSIDY REGULATIONS.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (22VAC40-191)
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Early Childhood Care and Education
32.1 Report by person other than physician
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
A renewal inspection was initiated on 2/17/22 and concluded on 2/24/22. There were 90 children present, ranging in ages from two to five. The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, medication, special care and emergencies and nutrition. A total of four child records and four staff records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined noncompliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the facility.
Violations
4Evidence;
1. The record for staff 4 has a central registry background check dated 9/19/16.
2. The director provided documentation of a central registry background check being mailed on 2/11/22.
Evidence:
1. The record for staff 3 documents the hire date as 1/15/20. The sworn statement documented staff 3 lived out of the state of VA within the last five years.
2. The central registry search for the state staff 3 lived in was dated 2/16/22.
3. The director states the sex offender background check was completed in November of 2021. A copy was in the file but was not dated.
Evidence:
1. The record for staff 1 only contained 10 hours of annual training for the timeframe of 2/15/21-2/14/22.
2. The record for staff 3 only contained 12 hours of annual training for the timeframe of 1/15/21-1/14/22.
3. The director verified staff 1 and staff 3 did not have more training hours for the timeframes provided.
Evidence:
1. During a medication review for child 4 the permission form stated the child was allergic to peanuts. There was no allergy care plan.
2. The director verified they did not have an allergy care plan.