Inspection · 2022-05-24
(571) 596-3656
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
An unannounced renewal inspection was conducted on 5/24/2022 from 10:00am to 1:15pm. At the time of entrance,105 children were in care with 21 staff members present. Children were observed doing the following: playing in centers, circle time discussion, computers, playing with playdough, bottle feeding in the infant classroom, playing on the floor with toys and sitting in a bouncy seat. The site was clean, organized and contained an abundant supply of developmentally appropriate materials. Interactions between the children and staff were positive. A selection of staff and children records, the physical space, emergency supplies, evacuation drills and attendance records were reviewed. Five medications were reviewed. Areas of non-compliance are identified in the violation notice. Please contact me if you have any questions at Stacy.Doyle@doe.virginia.gov or 571-835-0386.
Violations
3Evidence:
1. In the Penguin classroom, a soft blue step had 4 corners that were coming unsewn.
2. In the Astronauts classroom, a rug in the reading area was unraveling near the red box.
3. On the playground, 6 tricycles had rust on the frames.
4. On the basketball court, 2 squares tiles had small broken corners.
We will repair it by Friday.
We will have it repaired and send repair list by Friday.
We will replace the squares or order them by Friday.
Evidence:
1. Child A had 2 food items from home in the Penguin classroom refrigerator, but they were not labeled with the child's name and date.
Evidence:
1. Child #3's file listed the child had a food allergy, but the center did not have a written care plan for the child to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.