Inspection · 2023-02-13
(804) 588-2367
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
An unannounced renewal inspection was conducted on February 13, 2023 from approximately 10:15 am to 12:30 pm. There were 66 children in attendance and a total of 12 staff present. 5 staff records and 7 children?s records were viewed. All areas of the center were observed including classrooms, bathrooms, and the playground. The children were observed playing in centers, eating lunch and playing outside, while the licensing inspector was on-site.
Violations were cited as a result of this inspection.
Please complete the plan of correction and ?date to be corrected? for each violation cited on the violation notice and return it to me within 5 business days from today, 02/24/2023. Please specify how the deficient practice will be or has been corrected. Your plan of correction should contain: 1) steps to correct the noncompliance with the standard(s), 2) measures to prevent the noncompliance from occurring again, and 3) person(s) responsible for implementing each step and/or monitoring any preventative measure(s).
Violations
3Evidence: 1) Classroom #3 had 10 children ages 16-24 months with 2 staff supervising. The record for child #1, 15 months, determined that the child be placed in a 1:4 staff-to-children ratio. When interviewed, the Director stated that the child?s parent wanted them assigned to this age group. There was no written permission in the record for child #1 to be placed in a different age group.
2) Classroom #4 had 7 children, ages 24-36 months, with 1 staff supervising. The record for child #5, 17 months, determined that the child be placed in a 1:5 staff-to-children ratio. When interviewed, the Director stated that the child?s parent wanted them assigned to this age group. There was no written permission in the record for child #4 to be placed in a different age group.
3) Classroom #8 had 10 children, ages 3 to 5 years, with 1 staff supervising. The record for child #2, 35 months old, determined that the child be placed in a 1:8 staff-to-children ratio. When interviewed, the Director stated that the child?s parent wanted them assigned to this age group. There was no written permission in the record for child #2 to be placed in a different age group.