Inspection · 2023-01-11
(703) 397-3827
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-800 Administration
8VAC20-800 Personnel
8VAC20-800 Household Members
8VAC20-800 Physical Health of Caregivers and Household members
8VAC20-800 Caregiver Training
8VAC20-800 Physical Equipment and Environment
8VAC20-800 Care of Children
8VAC20-800 Preventing the Spread of Disease
8VAC20-800 Medication Administration
8VAC20-800 Emergencies
8VAC20-800 Nutrition
8VAC20-800 Transportation
8VAC20-800 Nighttime Care
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-820 HEARINGS PROCEDURES.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
54.1 Provider must be MAT certified to administer prescription medication.
63.2 Child abuse and neglect
Inspector Notes
A renewal inspection was conducted on 01/11/2023 between the hours of approximately 12:30 pm and 2:35 pm. There were 15 children present, ranging in ages from 7 months to 4 years, with 2 staff supervising. A second visit was conducted on 01/24/2023 to take measurements to the play structure in the backyard. On this date, there were 13 children present. On both dates the provider was caring for more children than her approved capacity, which is 12 children.
The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, medication, special care and emergencies and nutrition. A total of 4 child records and 2 staff records were reviewed.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program. If you have any questions regarding this inspection, please contact the Licensing Inspector, Maria Robles at maria.robles@doe.virginia.gov.
Violations
12Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, certificates in the record for Staff #2 documented having completed only 5 of the required 16 hours of annual training.
Evidence:
1) Cleaning agents (Lysol cleaner, Lysol spray, Lysol wipes, spray bottle with vinegar, soap and water mixture) were stored in a cloth organizer hanging on the wall. These cleaning agents were within children's reach.
2) A bottle of Clorox bleach was observed outside, sitting on the floor next to the glass sliding door that gives access to the backyard.
3) Paint cans and yard equipment were observed inside the shed located in the play area on the backyard. The door to this shed did not have a locking mechanism.
evidence:
1) The approved capacity of the current license is 12 children. On the date of inspection, there were 14 children under care. At one point, there were 15 children under care.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, there was no attendance record for the day and the week available for review.
Evidence:
1) The play structure in the backyard of the family day home has two platforms at different heights. On 01/24/2023 the lower platform measured 55.5 inches (4.5 ft) and the higher platform measured 83 inches (6.91 ft). On the visit of 01/11/2023, the inspector observed children between the ages of 23 months and 4 years playing on this structure.
Evidence:
1) The play structure in the backyard of the family day home has a net and a loose rope intended for the children to climb to the lower platform. Children in care were observed using this net/rope to climb.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, two of four children sleeping in cribs were older than 12 months of age and did not present any developmental issue/reason to not be ready to sleep on a cot or rest mat. (Child #11- 17 months and Child #6 - 2 years)
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, four children sleeping in cribs were observed using blankets. Two of these children were infants. (Child # 5 - 10 mos and Child #13 - 11 mos)
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, there were two caregivers supervising the children (7 months to 4 years). The total points was 37. The fdh was 5 points over.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, there were no records for Child #3, Child #8 and Child #14.
Evidence:
1) The menu posted was not dated for the current one-week period.
2) The menu did not have listed the substitutions for the day.
Evidence:
1) On the date of inspection, the findings of the most recent inspection of the facility (08/29/2022) were not posted as required.