Inspection · 2022-05-04
(703) 479-4675
Areas Reviewed
22.1 Background Checks Code
22VAC40-665 Subsidy Program Vendor Requirements for Family Day Homes
22VAC40-665 General qualifications
22VAC40-665 Building or home maintenance.
22VAC40-665 Supervision and ratio requirements
22VAC40-665 Programs
22VAC40-665 Special Care Provisions & Emergencies
22VAC40-665 Special Services
Inspector Notes
A scheduled subsidy inspection was conducted at 10:03am. An interpreter was used for communication between the inspector and vendor. There was 1 child present = 2 points with the vendor. Ratios and supervision were in compliance at the time of inspection. The child was observed drawing, playing with toys, eating lunch, and reading books. Lunch today included: fish, rice, broccoli, watermelon, and water. The vendors interactions with the child were pleasant and patient. The home found to be clean, organized, and well supplied with toys and equipment for the children. Information gathered during the inspection determined there were areas of non-compliance with applicable standards or laws reviewed. Questions about this inspection may be directed to pamela.sneed@doe.virginia.gov
Note: Current regulation and Code numbers are handwritten on the original inspection report issued to the Provider.
Violations
3Evidence:
1) Adult #1 - There is no documentation of a criminal record check/fingerprinting, according to the local agency. [Note: The central registry check was sent on 3/18/22 and the local agency is awaiting results.]
2) Adult #2 - There was no documentation of a sworn disclosure statement, criminal record check/fingerprinting, and central registry check. Adult #2 moved into the home on 5/1/22.
2) Adult #2 - The vendor stated that she has the paperwork for the background checks and will have Adult #2 complete them promptly.
The vendor agreed to have all background check documents submitted within 10-days.
Evidence:
1) Child #1 - There was no documentation that the child's proof of identity was viewed by the vendor; there was no emergency contact person listed (name, address, and phone number), the space was left blank; and there was no written permission for the vendor to transport the child in the car.
2) Child #2 - There was no documentation that the child's proof of identity was viewed by the vendor; and there was no written permission for the vendor to transport the child in the car.
Evidence:
1) Child #1 - Immunizations were dated November 2020, when the child was 7 months old.
2) Child #2 - Immunizations were dated October 2018, when the child was 15 months old.