Inspection · 2022-06-21
(804) 629-7103
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
Today an unannounced Renewal Inspection took place between the hours of 10:05 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. There were 3 classrooms observed with a total of 28 children with 5 staff within the supervision guidelines. The children were observed playing on the playground, participating in circle time, and other organized activities. A complete inspection of the physical plant, children and staff records, fire drill log, and emergency procedures were observed during this inspection. If you have any questions, please e-mail me at ann.dramstad@doe.virginia.gov. Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection.
Violations
9Evidence: Staff #1 stated that the building does not have a carbon monoxide detector.
Evidence: In the Playful Dolphins classroom, an outlet on the back wall did not have a protective covering.
Evidence: At the time of inspection, the bathroom in the Playful Dolphins classroom did not have toilet paper.
Evidence:
1. The Cuddly Koalas classroom had 8 infants and 1 teacher for approximately two minutes.
2. Staff #2 stated that the second teacher stepped out to go to the restroom.
Evidence: The injury prevention plan was missing the signature and date of the review.
Evidence:
1. Child #1?s records indicate a dairy sensitivity and maple syrup allergy. Posted allergy lists in the Playful Dolphins, Panda Bears, Cuddly Koalas and Busy Bees classrooms did not list Child #1?s sensitivities and allergy.
2. Posted allergy lists in the Playful Dolphins, Panda Bears, Cuddly Koalas and Busy Bees classrooms did not list Child #2?s egg, wheat and fish intolerances.
3. The allergy lists in the Playful Dolphins and Busy Bees classrooms were not kept confidential.
Evidence:
1. At the time of inspection, there was no written authorization form for Child #4 and Child #5?s diaper creams.
2. At the time of inspection, the written authorization form for Child #6?s cream was incomplete.
3. At the time of inspection, Child #4?s eczema cream was not labeled.
Evidence: Child #1?s record indicates a maple syrup allergy. At the time of inspection, the record for Child #1 did not include a written allergy care plan.
Evidence: At the time of inspection, Child #3 was present in the classroom. Child #3 was not checked in on the center attendance app.