Inspection · 2021-10-27
(804) 588-2367
Areas Reviewed
22VAC40-185 ADMINISTRATION.
22VAC40-185 STAFF QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING.
22VAC40-185 PHYSICAL PLANT.
22VAC40-185 STAFFING AND SUPERVISION.
22VAC40-185 PROGRAMS.
22VAC40-185 SPECIAL CARE PROVISIONS AND EMERGENCIES.
22VAC40-185 SPECIAL SERVICES.
22VAC40-80 THE LICENSE.
22VAC40-80 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
22VAC40-191 Background Checks (22VAC40-191)
Inspector Notes
An announced initial inspection was conducted on-site on October 27, 2021. The inspector was on-site from 10am-12:30pm. The owner, director, and an agent were present.
The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas of administration, physical plant, staffing and supervision, programming, medication, special care and emergencies and nutrition. The owner's record and the agent's record were reviewed.
New requirements became effective on October 13, 2021. The facility has not yet [fully] complied with the following requirement(s): emergency preparedness plan updates (standards 8VAC20-780-550-A and 8VAC20-780-550-B). The facility is to review the new requirements and work with their assigned inspector to ensure future compliance.
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice issued to the program.
Please complete the ?plan of correction? and ?date to be corrected? for each violation cited on the violation notice and return it to me within 5 business days from today. Please specify how the deficient practice will be or has been corrected. Your plan of correction should contain: 1) steps to correct the noncompliance with the standard(s), 2) measures to prevent the noncompliance from occurring again; and 3) person(s) responsible for implementing each step and/or monitoring any preventative measures. Please do not use staff names; list staff by positions only.
Violations
6Evidence: The staff handbook did not address the following policies: 1. Procedures for supervising a child who may arrive after scheduled classes or activities including field trips have begun;
2. Procedures to confirm absence of a child when the child is scheduled to arrive from another program or from an agency responsible for transporting the child to the center;
3. Procedures for identifying where attending children are at all times, including procedures to ensure that all children are accounted for before leaving a field trip site and upon return to the center;
4. Procedures for action in case of lost or missing children, ill or injured children, medical emergencies, and general emergencies;
5. Policy for any administration of medication;
6. Emergency evacuation, relocation, shelter-in-place, and lockdown procedures; and
7. Precautions in transporting children, if applicable.
Evidence: 1. The preschool area contained peeling paint approximately 1.5 x 2 inches in size.
2. The cubbies in the preschool area had multiple areas of the unit with chipped and peeling paint.
Evidence: 1. Administration stated the center's emergency plan was not developed in consultation with local or state authorities.
2. After review of the emergency preparedness plan it did not contain a plan to include intruder and terrorism.
Evidence: 1. The procedural components did not contain documentation for sounding of alarms, such as intruder, shelter-in-place, or chemical hazard.
2. The emergency communication did not contain the a.) establishment of center emergency officer and back-up officer to include 24-hour contact telephone number for each; b.) notification of local authorities, such as fire and rescue, law enforcement, emergency medical services, poison control, health department, and parents and local media; and
c. Availability and primary use of communication tools.
3. Evacuation plan did not include a.) Assembly points, head counts, primary and secondary means of egress, and complete evacuation of the buildings; b.) Securing of essential documents and special healthcare supplies to be carried to the designated assembly points c.) Method of communication after the evacuation;
4. The shelter-in-place did not contain a.) scenario applicability, for a tornado, inside assembly points, head counts, and primary and secondary means of access and egress; b.) Securing of essential documents, and special health supplies to be carried to the designated assembly points; c.) Method of communication after the shelter-in-place
Evidence: 1. The record of the Owner did not contain documentation of a sworn statement. The sworn statement was completed during the inspection.
2. The owner acknowledged the sworn statement was not complete when it was asked for.
Evidence: 1. The record of Agent #1 did not contain documentation of central registry results and a sworn statement. The sworn statement was completed during the inspection.
2. Administration acknowledged the results of the central registry were not in the record.