Inspection · 2024-08-15
(571) 423-6735
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS
8VAC20-770 Background Checks
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Early Childhood Care and Education
8VAC20-790 Introduction
8VAC20-790 Administration
8VAC20-790 Staff Qualifications & Training
8VAC20-790 Physical Plant
8VAC20-790 Program
VAC20-790 Staffing & Supervision
8VAC20-790 Special Care Provisions & Emergencies
8VAC20-790 Special Services
Inspector Notes
An unannounced inspection was initiated on 8/15/2024 and completed on 9/23/2024 in response to a complaint received by the licensing office on 8/14/2024 relating to allegations of supervision, staff qualifications/training and staff to child ratios. The inspector reviewed 2 children?s records and 2 staff records on-site on 8/15/2024. This inspection included document review, tour of the facility, interviews, and observations. The preponderance of evidence gathered during the investigation supports the allegations; therefore, the complaint is determined to be valid. Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and the violations are documented on the violation notice issued to the program.
Violations
4Based on a review of staff records, 1 out of 2 staff did not authorize the child day center
described in subsection A to obtain a copy of the results of a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
Evidence:
1. Staff #2 did not have documentation of a sex offender registry check and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years at the time of the inspection.
Evidence:
1. Staff #2 did not have documentation on file of a central registry record check for Virginia and had been employed more than 30 days at the facility.
Evidence:
1. Staff #1 did not have documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening on file at the time of the inspection.
2. Staff #2 did not have documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening on file at the time of the inspection.
Evidence:
1. Staff #1 was missing an emergency contact, 2 of 2 required character references, staff orientation, and proof of education/qualifications.
2. Staff #2 was missing 2 of 2 required character references, and staff orientation.