Inspection · 2024-06-07
(757) 636-3427
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect
Inspector Notes
An unannounced monitoring inspection was conducted on June 7, 2024 from 10:10am to 2:45pm in conjunction with a complaint investigation At the time of the inspection there were 19 infants in care and 2 staff members. Children were observed participating in various activities including diapering, meal time, free choice play. Records were reviewed for five children and five staff members. Evacuation drills, emergency supplies and other required records and postings were reviewed. The information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law and violations were documented on the violation notice and discussed with the director during the exit interview.
Violations
13Evidence:
1. Staff #3 did not have a criminal history background check and was observed caring for infant children during the inspection.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that Staff #3 did not have a criminal history background check completed prior to employment and was caring for infant children.
Evidence:
1. The record for Staff #4 (hired 4/8/2024) did not contain documentation of the central registry results.
2. Staff #1 (confirmed) that the record for staff #4 did not contain documentation of a central registry results by the 30th day of employment.
Evidence:
1. Staff #3 did not have documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening and was in contact with children in the center during the inspection.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that staff #3 did not have documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening and was in contact with children in the center.
Evidence:
1. The record for staff #4 (hired 4/8/2024) did not include documentation of a completed orientation training and has been working.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that there was no documentation of a completed orientation training for staff #4.
Evidence:
1. The record for Staff #2 (hired 11/15/2020) and Staff # 5 (hired 11/23/2020) did not have documented training hours for 2023 in their record.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that the documentation for the annual minimum of 16 hours of training was not in the record for staff #2 and #5.
Evidence:
1. A container of laundry detergent was stored above four canisters of baby formula.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that the laundry detergent was stored above the baby formula.
Evidence:
1. Staff #2 confirmed she was alone in the center caring for four infants for approximately ten minutes before an additional staff member arrived.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that staff #2 was alone at the center caring for children.
Evidence:
1. Upon entrance to the infant center, inspectors observed for approximately 20 minutes, that the infant classroom had 19 children from ages nine months to 16 months and two staff, where five would have been required.
2. Staff #1 (Director) confirmed that the staff to child ratio was not 1 to 4 for the children in care ages birth to 16 months and further acknowledged that 3 more staff were needed.
Evidence:
1. 14 of the 19 infants under 24 months were observed strapped and sitting at an activity table with no activities for approximately 45 minutes.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that the staff did not provide change in play space.
Evidence:
1. Eight of the ten cribs in the infant room were not identified for use by a specific child.
2. Staff #1 (director) confirmed that the cribs were not identified for use by a specific child.
Evidence:
1. 10 bottles were inspected in the refrigerator.
a. Two did not have a name and date.
b. Two did not have a date.
2. Four canisters of baby formula were inspected.
a. One did not have a name.
3. Staff #1 (Director) confirmed that the bottles and formula listed did not have the required information.
Evidence:
1. Child #1 (age 9 months) did not have a record at the center and was in care during the inspection
2. The Director, Staff #1, confirmed that Child #1 did not have a record at the center.
Evidence:
1. The records for staff #2, staff #3, staff #4 and staff #5 did not have documentation of education via high school diplomas or transcripts.
2. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that the records for staff #2, #3, #4 and #5 did not include documentation of education.
3. The records for staff #3, staff #4 and staff #5 did not contain two or more references.
4. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that documentation of two or more references was completed for staff #3, #4 and #5 before employment.
5. The director stated that staff #3 was on a ?working interview? and did not have a staff
record on file and was caring for infant children.
6. The director, Staff #1 confirmed that there were no staff records at the center for Staff #3
who began working earlier in the week.