Inspection · 2024-09-20
(804) 629-7124
Areas Reviewed
8VAC20-800 Administration
8VAC20-800 Personnel
8VAC20-800 Household Members
8VAC20-800 Physical Health of Caregivers and Household members
8VAC20-800 Caregiver Training
8VAC20-800 Physical Equipment and Environment
8VAC20-800 Care of Children
8VAC20-800 Preventing the Spread of Disease
8VAC20-800 Medication Administration
8VAC20-800 Emergencies
8VAC20-800 Nutrition
8VAC20-770 Background Checks
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
54.1 Provider must be MAT certified to administer prescription medication.
63.2 Child abuse and neglect
Inspector Notes
An unannounced, on-site renewal inspection was completed on 09/2024, as a part of the conditional licensure period. The on-site inspection began at 10:40am and ended at 11:25am. The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas listed above. There was 1 child present and 1 caregiver present upon arrival with 2 more arriving during the inspection. The inspector reviewed 1 children?s records and 7 caregiver/household member records on-site. This inspection included:
?document review
?interviews
?observations
Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law, and violations are documented on the violation notice issued to the program.
Please complete the plan of correction (POC) and date to be corrected sections for each violation cited on the violation notice. Specify how the deficient practice will be or has been corrected. Submit your POC within five (5) business days from today, which will be the close of business on 10/01/2024. A POC submitted after this date will not appear on the public website.
Violations
3The sworn statement for caregiver #2, who is currently working, was dated 7 weeks after their first day of employment.
Original SD was lost and a new one created and signed on the date that this was issued was discovered.
Caregiver #2, who had been employed for 7 weeks, did not have a completed national criminal background check.
It should be noted that Caregiver#2 has passed all required investigations but they are only valid at a different location.
Caregiver #2, who had been employed for 7 weeks, did not have a central registry search requested. Caregiver #2 was working alone with children.
It should be noted that Caregiver #2 has passed all required investigations but they only valid at a different location.