Virginia
Sign in
Back
Supreme Scholars Development Center 4

Inspection · 2024-07-30

Date
2024-07-30
Complaint Related
No
Licensing Inspector
Adrianna Walden
(757) 404-2487
SHSIA monitoring inspection of an approved subsidy vendor to determine compliance with current subsidy requirements regarding the health and safety of children and to promote quality standards for the children in their care.
No

Areas Reviewed

8VAC20-780 Administration.
8VAC20-780 Staff Qualifications and Training.
8VAC20-780 Physical Plant.
8VAC20-780 Staffing and Supervision.
8VAC20-780 Programs.
8VAC20-780 Special Care Provisions and Emergencies
8VAC20-780 Special Services.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSE.
8VAC20-820 THE LICENSING PROCESS.
8VAC20-820 HEARINGS PROCEDURES.
8VAC20-770 Background Checks (8VAC20-770)
20 Access to minor?s records
22.1 Background Checks Code, Carbon Monoxide
63.2 Child Abuse & Neglect

Inspector Notes

An unannounced, on-site renewal inspection was conducted on 07/30/2024, as a part of the conditional licensure period. The on-site inspection began at 10:30am and ended at 11:45am.The inspector reviewed compliance in the areas listed above. There were 10 children present and 3 staff. The inspector reviewed 4 children?s records and 3 staff records This inspection included a document review, tour of facility, interviews, observations and measurements. Information gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standards or law, and violations are documented on the violation notice issued to the program.

Please complete Plan Of Correction (POC) and date to be corrected sections for each violation cited on the violation notice. Specify how the deficient practice will be or has been corrected. Submit your POC within five (5) business days from today, A POC submitted after this date will not appear on the public website

Violations

5
Standard 8VAC20-780-140-A
Based on a record review the center did not ensure all children had a physical under the direction of a physician.
Evidence:
Child #1, (enrolled 05/20/2024) did not have documentation of a physical examination.
Plan of Correction: The child has never been in childcare or in school. Mom has a physical appointment scheduled, however, the office has been backed up. I have a
note in the child?s file that the appointment for the physical is scheduled.
Standard 8VAC20-780-280-B
Based on observation the center did not ensure hazardous substances were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method.
Evidence:
There was a can of disinfectant spray in an unlocked cabinet below the infant handwashing sink. The cabinet had a lock, however it was broken.
Plan of Correction: The child safety lock that was on one of the Infant sink was a little worn.
The lock was replaced the same day.
Standard 8VAC20-780-440-B
Based on observation and interview the center did not ensure cots were identified for use by a specific child.
Evidence:
The children's cots were not labeled to identify use by a specific child. The program leader confirmed they were not labeled in a way that showed which cot belonged to which child.
Plan of Correction: Cots are labeled by number and staff know which number pertains to which
child. Cots have been labeled to name only.
Standard 8VAC20-780-510-I
Based on observation and interview the center did not ensure all requirements were met when administering medication.
Evidence
The center had an emergency medication for child #4 that was not maintained in the original, labeled container. The designated person In charge confirmed that the child's mother did not provide the center with the original box.
Plan of Correction: The following corrective actions were provided by the director via email:
The EpiPen received from the family comes in a three pack Where momkept the other two in the original packaging and took home. The medication label is attached directly to the EpiPen . Mom has been informed and will be original
packaging.
Standard 8VAC20-780-560-F
Based on observation, record review and interview the center did not ensure all requirements were met when choosing to provide meals or snacks.
Evidence:
1. Children were observed during lunch eating foods that are considered to be potential choking hazards for children 3 years and under.
a. Children under the age of 3 years-old were observed eating raw baby carrots with their lunch.
b. Staff interview and record review confirmed the ages of children ranged from 1 year - 5 years.
c. The youngest child in the group was 1 year-old.
d. Staff confirmed that the carrots were not cooked.

2. The center did not list on the menu substituted items.
a. The menu posted on the parent board in the front lobby listed Anti-Pasto Salad was the main lunch item.
b. The Children were served and observed eating Tuna with Whole Wheat Crackers.
c. Staff confirmed that when food is substituted it is listed on the menu.
Plan of Correction: 1. Children under 3 years old will not receive raw carrots. 2. Meals are delivered on a daily basis from a third party Food Program. Staff are not always aware of the
substitutions. Menus willreflect what is sent on a daily moving forward.
View original record on Virginia Department of Social Services